Subscribe to RSS Add to Technorati Faves Digg This Page Send to Stumble Upon Bookmark on Delicious

Will LTE become the 'Red Headed Stepchild' for the Telco's?

posted by Gregory Ofili on July 23, 2008

There is a lot of talk these days about Telco’s deploying LTE, etc, etc…. Let’s ignore the fact that LTE remains ‘Vaporware’ today, (all talk, and no product in sight, not even an IEEE standard in sight).

So, if and when it does get here, then how will the proponents of LTE position it? LTE, and WiMAX for that matter, are both packet technologies. WiMAX is super fast, open, no walled garden, etc, just the internet we know and love, but mobile. LTE is being positioned as essentially the same as WiMAX.

Gosh, I can’t help but wonder about the effect of positioning LTE beside DSL, or LTE beside traditional semi-walled garden 3G services. Looks to me like the incumbents have a cannibalization problem on their hands. No surprise, since WiMAX and LTE are both disruptive.

Simply cloning WiMAX and renaming it LTE does not change the fact that it is a highly disruptive technology. I have not seen business models from the Telco’s that take WiMAX/LTE into consideration. For the Telco’s, whether they deploy WiMAX, or WiMAX by a different name (LTE), the incumbents still face the same problem: DSL, Home Phone, & Cellular service, are in for a serious shake up. What do you think?

Comments (0)
del.icio.us StumbleUpon Digg It

Post Your Comment




Comment Policy: We welcome your comments, however all comments are moderated. Offensive, off-topic or fraudulent comments will be deleted and not displayed. By submitting a comment to an Intel Blog, you agree to our legal information and privacy policy terms, including having your name displayed with your comment and that you are 13 years old or older. Your name and personal information will not be used for any other purpose, and your e-mail address will not be published.

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Intel. All Intel names and trademarks are the property of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.