Subscribe to RSS Add to Technorati Faves Digg This Page Send to Stumble Upon Bookmark on Delicious

Intel’s smallest announcement ever

posted by Denise Bohling on February 25, 2008

Turns out my cube neighbor CAN keep a secret. A big one in fact! She knows the new brand name for Intel’s smallest processor ever. But she’s not talking. Soon, on March 3, the guarded brand name will be revealed. Still I’m curious…. what will we call our smallest processor – the one that will bring an awesome Internet experience to small, mobile devices? Any brilliant guesses?

Watch the countdown to the moment when the name is revealed and check back here. We’ll cover what the new brand means for you and other mobility topics that you won’t find anywhere else on the web.

Comments (20)
del.icio.us StumbleUpon Digg It
tagged: , ,

Comments

Feb 26  |  icurafu said:

Let me guess. PentiUMPC. :D

I hope it’s more creative than my A110. ;)

Feb 26  |  Bob said:

Is this Centaur’s new out of order processor we have been hearing about?

http://tinyurl.com/37f293 (H Enthusiast on Centaur)

Feb 26  |  Mike Waters said:

Diet Centrino

Feb 26  |  icurafu said:

Bob - This is not Centaur’s. It’s the Silverthorne by Intel. I understand that the Centaur CPU will be released for Desktops and Laptops at first. This is a UMPC and MID CPU.

Feb 26  |  mm said:

It should be WiMAX. I can’t wait baby.

Feb 28  |  Elia Rodriguez said:

The Nano… could be Nano 45, Nano 32 (but then again Apple already has a Nano)

Feb 29  |  Taylor said:

i think it should be called the “Midget.” i think it should be called that, makes sense.

Feb 29  |  Greg said:

mini mite

Feb 29  |  Ram Kandula said:

Intel Mini Intel Air

Feb 29  |  Arman said:

I guess “Diminutive”

Feb 29  |  Fuzzy Little Man Peach said:

Call it the “Recall” cuz its coming back….may times!

Feb 29  |  Truman Trowbridge Legg said:

TeenieVAC

Feb 29  |  Don said:

something with a nice seight and not generating associations with multicore technology that much- Cape xxx, Hamptons, something like that. Nothing hot or tropical, somthing hat says: nothern california,married, spiritually fullfilled but serious and not a protected nor reserved trademark- if i was in the mood i´d go to google- map.

As it was announced that it would be a step as important as the P1´s release i expect something special, not just santa rosa or northwood. Manhattan would be nice if not reserved in many ways, maybe bear lake or shady grove or something edaquate, “Bear Lake” or las vegas ? Anyways, if it does not sound like one of the standard desktop wallpaper pics could have been taken there it is a cold bet.

just one day more and we will know.

Feb 29  |  Mike Masnick said:

In lieu with Intel’s very creative current naming scheme, it’d probably be something like Intel Core M- obviously standing for Mobile. Duh -_-.

Of course, I might be completely off, and they decided to go with the Core 2 Tweeny.

Feb 29  |  Jerome said:

Probably Intel Core M- for Mobile of course, considering Intel’s current very creative name scheme.

Or perhaps, I might be entirely wrong and it’s simply Intel Core 2 Tweeny. Beware!

Feb 29  |  George said:

It will be “Atom”

Mar 01  |  benderbrau said:

i think like: minix,nanox,microx…some like cyberpunk nicks:)

Mar 01  |  Steve said:

Intel 8088 NANO

Mar 02  |  onel810 said:

i think it is Intel penryn… heheh…

Mar 02  |  Ken Kaplan said:

Great guesses! The official brand names announced here http://tinyurl.com/24tyzh.

Post Your Comment





Comment Policy: We welcome your comments, however all comments are moderated. Offensive, off-topic or fraudulent comments will be deleted and not displayed. By submitting a comment to an Intel Blog, you agree to our legal information and privacy policy terms, including having your name displayed with your comment and that you are 13 years old or older. Your name and personal information will not be used for any other purpose, and your e-mail address will not be published.

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Intel. All Intel names and trademarks are the property of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.