Subscribe to RSS Add to Technorati Faves Digg This Page Send to Stumble Upon Bookmark on Delicious

Web 4.0: A New Hype

posted by Jeff Moriarty on November 14, 2006

Here at Intel we’re no longer the stodgy, behind the curve company your parents (or perhaps your older siblings) remember. No, we’re now hip, happening, trendy, and zippy. We’re so far out in front we can see the back of our own heads. Web 2.0 may have been about web applications and combining data, and Web 3.0 may have been about the great availability of the super-information cloud through aggregated applications leveraging articulated APIs, but now we’re on the dawn of the cusp of Web 4.0, and Intel is in the lead.

Web 4.0 is the impending state at which all information converges into a great ball of benevolent self-aware light, and solves every problem from world peace to why Lost stinks this season. All humans will begin working 24x7 to feed our new data overlord on a steady diet of email, PowerPoint foils, and cute pictures of our grandkids and/or dogs. The final transition to this state of computational bliss will be achieved by the soon to be announced Super Core Infinity Grande processor line, which puts an infinite number of cores in a single processor. We will officially announce this processor the day before a nameless competitor announces their Infinity+1 line of processors, which will puncture a hole in the fabric of space and destroy us all. The upside of this annihilation is that it will prevent anyone from coming up with Web 5.0…

…or not…

All seriousness aside, “Web 2.0” gives me a raging headache. In the battle of Style vs. Substance, this topic spends too much time in the wardrobe department. I hear the tale of Web 2.0 in grand, sweeping terms, with rare details. I hear it from people who seem more concerned with being attached to “the next big thing” than really driving value from it. I hear it from companies whose managers read about Web 2.0 in a magazine, and want to catch the vibe. And if I hear one more frothy Web 2.0 evangelist tells me it is primarily about the “culture”, he had better start running.

I get this Headache 2.0 because there is something of value at the core that I want, but all the hype makes it harder to achieve. Marty asked about this value, so here’s my answer. What I’m after from this Brave New Paradigm is the value that comes from combining data, letting it flow, and having it influence people (and companies) in unexpected ways. Intel’s culture is still one of separated groups and deep structure. We could be an immensely more agile company if we had more open, dynamic dialogues, both internally and between us and our customers. Yet we struggle with the most basic elements. Our internal blogs get little use, and the few managers that do “blog” mostly just have their assistants put up press-releases once a month. (Marty is one of the exceptions). Not much discussion there. We have an internal wiki that is doing well, and just celebrated its 1st Birthday, but is grossly underutilized for a company like Intel. Even these external blogs arrived only after fierce battles and crazy amounts of approvals and red tape.

The people inside Intel that see the value of these tools and free-flowing information are pushing hard, and change is starting to come, but I can’t help but think how much further along we would be if people weren’t expecting glorious shining lights and fresh minty breath just by being in the same room as this stuff. I laughed out loud when we announced our SuiteTwo Web 2.0 package. We’re Web 2.0, are we cool yet?

Perhaps Web 2.0 is just like any other Flavor of the Moment that sweeps our industry. If you believe in its value you just have to roll up your sleeves, brace yourself for a lot of fights, and directly participate in making it happen… there is no short cut. I just think it would be a danged sight easier if the carnival barkers would shut up for a while. Well… if not easier, at least it would be quieter.

Comments (8)
del.icio.us StumbleUpon Digg It
tagged: , , , , ,

Comments

Nov 16  |  Heath Buckmaster said:

actually jeff, you’re already behind the times. i’ve got the web 8.5 beta implant installed, so i have instant connectivity to every site on the planet, right from within my skull.

the virtual world is like second life, i can interact with news sites, entertainment sites, and reference materials, as if i was in a virtual library, walking the halls and pulling books off the shelves.

i think intel’s got a niche there - we power the real computer “inside” …. remember the Simpsons (tm) adverts from years ago, when Homer had a Pentium (tm) embedded inside his skull….not so far fetched for Web 5.0+.

Nov 21  |  Ben Buck said:

If the barkers quiet down, the theory might be that the real applications could be heard — signal to noise — hmmm, a fundamental and oft-used-within-Intel term like that isn’t in the intelpedia — and I’m not going to spend the time to add it. The trouble is the depth and quality of the information. The whole world doesn’t need to know about the throes of the initial program on flash memory — not all of Intel needs to know either — but some engineers need to. The barkers want to make you believe that they have the way to get the crucial information you need to you easier. Maybe the answer is much more prosaic in most cases — who already knows and how do I schedule to ask them?

So what exactly does go into a process to make it run databases and AI faster as opposed to, say, graphics or games? (Aren’t those what would be necessary to get us the right information faster?)

Nov 25  |  Karl said:

The one problem with Wikis and blogs is that the opinion-to-fact ratio is waay out of whack. Essentially we’ve all turned ourselves into columnists. Now I enjoyed Mike Royko, (and Dear Abby wasn’t half bad sometimes) but I never took either one of them seriously. I don’t take blogs seriously either…

Nov 26  |  Nathan Zeldes said:

I would recommend not taking ANYONE seriously, whether they’re bloggers, “regular” journalists, respected professors, or anyone else, unless you’ve first put their statements through the test of your own critical analysis. Which would take the opinion-to-fact ratio into account. Not that opinion is necessarily a bad thing - Galileo had this (highly disreputable) opinion that the earth moves around the sun…

Nov 29  |  Micheil said:

Wikis are scary business. By the way, is wiki a proper noun? Should I be capitalizing the w? Anyway. In the book “1984” there was Newspeak and the concept that Big Brother could rewrite history as necessary. Now, wikis allow anyone to rewrite anything, similar to “1984”. However, our vocabulary is increasing, opposite of the concept of Newspeak.

Today, in 2006, we still have books; we still have perminent records of different kinds. But just as Nathan pionted out the evolution of an opinion to fact, it would seem that the current adoption and increasing popularity of the wiki is cementing its dubious place in our society.

So, on the opinion and fact dialogue: Something is a fact only until it is proven wrong. I think that is the antithesis of what Nathan was trying to say with the Galileo comment.

Nov 29  |  Nathan Zeldes said:

Nope… I don’t think Micheil’s analogy holds. Big Brother could rewrite history precisely because there were NO wikis in 1984. What the blogosphere does is ensure that anyone with a convincing counterproof can put it into the public’s view. I was also trying to point out that traditional print media and authority systems were just as prone to error as a Wiki is, so in any case the determination of truth is the duty of the reader.

Dec 08  |  Michael Norton said:

Jeff, I have the recipe for Web 5.0. You in the Portland area?

Dec 08  |  steven e. streight aka vaspers the grate said:

Excuse me, but there’s nothing scary or Big Brothery about a wiki, Hawaiian for “quick”. You have admin privileges and registration, etc. to avoid those problems mentioned above.

Post Your Comment




Comment Policy: We welcome your comments, however all comments are moderated. Offensive, off-topic or fraudulent comments will be deleted and not displayed. By submitting a comment to an Intel Blog, you agree to our legal information and privacy policy terms, including having your name displayed with your comment and that you are 13 years old or older. Your name and personal information will not be used for any other purpose, and your e-mail address will not be published.

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Intel. All Intel names and trademarks are the property of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.