I attend the annual BSR Conference in NYC last week. It was a very inspiring week and I met a lot of people and had some great conversations. During the night of the election, I walked over to the Rockefeller Center with some colleagues from Apple to view the election results. It was a very electrifying atmosphere and it was exciting to be part of the crowd for this historic election. My Apple friends were showing off their iphones and offered to take a photo of me – my older model blackberry doesn’t have a camera, which they did not let me forget.The conference had some really good sessions. I especially enjoyed the presentation by Jeffrey Immelt, GE – CEO. He gave some nice simple strategies for CSR management. I also enjoyed the presentation by John Anderson, CEO Levi Strauss & Co. He was very down-to-earth and pragmatic in his approach; however, it could have been he was wearing blue jeans and not a suit (?) One of the things I struggle with at these conferences is the definition of Sustainability. It seems to me when we are discussing sustainability; we are taking about how we maintain the life style we currently have and help other emerging markets improve their standard of living too – without – impacting ours. We fly to expensive conferences, stay in expensive hotels, eat great meals and talk about how we are working to make the world a better place to live. We then go back to our gigantic homes (by world standards) and drive one of our multiple cars, and plan our next vacation. Now I’m not pointing the finger at others, because I realize when you point a finger at someone else, three point back at yourself, but I’m simply asking can we continue to consume at the rate we do while other emerging economies move up their rates of consumption? Can we have sustainability without some sacrifice – meaning, having less stuff and using less stuff? And if we do consume less, what happens to our economy since it’s so driven by consumption. At these conferences, we discuss how we make stuff more efficiently and in a way that is less harmful to the environment, when we might be asking why we need so much stuff in the first place. We also seem to never take up the topics of the food we eat or the number of offspring we have. We discuss a lot of great initiatives, but the proverbial “elephants in the room”: food choices, children and our consumption levels, roam around without much discussion. Maybe these issues are just too polarizing to discuss, but it would be nice to see these topics on the agenda for a major CSR conference.
Connect with Us
Intel Corporate Responsibility Report
TagsChina Classmate PC climate change Corporate responsibility corporate social responsibility Craig Barrett CSR CSR report Davos eco-technology Education employee engagement energy efficiency Entrepreneurship environment girls and women green ICT IESC innovation Inspire Intel Intel CSR Intel Education Intel Education Service Corps Intel Involved Intel ISEF Intel STS Intel Teach ISEF08 Kenya renewable energy science science fair solar Stangis STEM sustainability technology technology entrepreneurship technology innovation Vietnam volunteering World Ahead World Economic Forum