I’ve been around Intel for a long time now. The beginning of the New Year is a notoriously busy time. We are usually working hard on the upcoming corporate responsibility report and the many other projects that seem to start in January. However this first week in January, has been one of the most challenging I’ve seen. Intel and the OLPC Association have parted ways.This isn’t a “he said she said” post. It’s not an attempt to make excuses or to blame the other side. It’s not an effort to seek forgiveness or acceptance. There are at least two sides to every story. From what I’ve been reading, this one has a lot more than that. A few of the technology blogs like Slashdot and GIZMODO seem to include comments that look at the angle from both sides. However, the vast majority of the public will take their perception from stories like the one that ran in Saturday’s New York Times. And, why shouldn’t they? Most accounts portray Intel as not keeping its end of the agreement. Hindsight is always 20/20. No one in their right mind would have joined forces with this outcome in mind. When I first learned Intel was considering joining the OLPC initiative and its board, I thought it was a great idea. We had, and have, the same basic goal-to improve education of the world’s underserved children by providing them access to technology. I thought the relationship was a win-win. I don’t know all the people involved that worked hard to try to make this work however, I know the people at Intel that were involved on this project. They entered this project with passion, and more than just good intentions – they wanted to make a difference. We invested people’s time, resources, and millions of dollars. Some may see this simply as a PR stunt gone badly, but I can tell you, we are not a company that would approach PR in this manner. I’m not sure what this will look like when the dust settles. I know OLPC will continue on its path, and I wish them success. I also know Intel will continue in its investment in improving education around the world. I’ve built my career at Intel by working towards mutual gains, win-wins, accountability and building trust. I think that last characteristic may be the most important. It may also be the one thing that was missing in this relationship. I’m saddened and disappointed that this collaboration came to its current state. This result is lose-lose. I know we have a lot of great initiatives and strategies that will be announced as 2008 continues to march on. This first week of 2008 will weigh on us for some time. But, we will continue to grow and build the CSR/sustainability strategies inside Intel. We can never work too hard on that “Trust” characteristic. I know it takes years to build it, but it can be lost in an instant. And based on some of the e-mails I’ve received in the last two days, I’d say it’s time to get back to work on it.
Connect With Us
Intel Corporate Responsibility Report
TagsChina Classmate PC climate change Corporate responsibility corporate social responsibility Craig Barrett CSR CSR report Davos eco-technology Education employee engagement energy efficiency Entrepreneurship entrepreneurship challenge environment girls and women green ICT IESC innovation Inspire Intel Intel CSR Intel Education Intel Education Service Corps Intel Involved Intel ISEF Intel STS Intel Teach ISEF08 Kenya renewable energy science science fair Stangis STEM sustainability technology technology entrepreneurship technology innovation vietnam volunteering World Ahead World Economic Forum
- Uri Shafrir on Intel Education Welcomes Kno to the Family
- Chuck Hitchcock on Intel Education Welcomes Kno to the Family
- Jason Jones-Hall on Science Fiction or Future Fact?
- Anjaly S on IESC Kenya: “Can You Teach Me?”
- Evie Sobczak on Ride Along with Algae Girl through Caltech and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab